Work area: Australian Energy Transitions

Why local governments are vital to Australia’s economic future 

As the ALGA National General Assembly wraps up in Canberra this Thursday, more than 1,000 local government leaders are heading home with a clearer sense of the scale of what is being asked of their communities and their councils, and what support they need to get the job done.  

It is a timely moment to reflect on the critical role local governments play not just in delivering services, but in shaping the economic transitions that will define regional Australia and our macro-economy for decades to come… 

Regional local governments are central to Australia’s economic transition and critical to ensuring change benefits their communities. Strengthening their capacity to plan, collaborate and create new opportunities will support transformational change in their regions for generations. 

Councils do far more than deliver infrastructure and essential services. Across Australia, local governments: 

  • Underpin local economies and community wellbeing 
  • Bring people together and advocate for their communities 
  • Support local development and represent community interests  

They also remain on the frontline of compounding pressures. Alongside communities, households and businesses they are feeling the impact of a range of moving pressures including but not limited to:  

  • More frequent extreme weather events 
  • Housing pressures and global market volatility 
  • National industry transitions and economic disruption 

Local government is often left acting as a ‘service provider of last resort’ ALGA noted in their Adapting Together Report in 2025, absorbing the consequences of forces largely outside their control. 

We hear from councils that the ask keeps growing, but the tools and resources haven’t kept pace. Outdated funding models and legislative frameworks mean councils are expected to do more with less, requiring new capabilities to: 

  • Manage change and reduce risks to services 
  • Respond early to forces shaping local growth and productivity 
  • Build resilience across their communities  

“Supporting locally designed solutions to complex problems is increasingly vital,” says The Next Economy’s Jacqui Bell. 

“While small rural local governments do not control all factors, they play a key role alongside other governments, community organisations, volunteers and local businesses in shaping a strong, sustainable future. 

“There is an imperative for local governments to continue to evolve into capable, collaborative and future-ready institutions. This means moving beyond traditional service delivery to deeper partnership with residents, businesses and institutions.  

“It also looks like developing strategic foresight capabilities, fostering innovation, making decisions based in evidence, acting early to mitigate and minimise impacts to services. Also, doing economic development differently in ways that build local wealth as well as respond to trends and pressures that impact growth, markets and productivity across the local economy. 

“Continued advocacy, attracting aligned investment and partnerships, and using policy and regulation to support a resilient, low-emissions economy will also be critical, alongside clear mandates and as we’ve seen today with ALGA’s emergency motion – adequate funding from state and national governments.” 

There are many examples of the wide ranging and evolving roles and needs of councils across Australia – all are leading on regional collaboration, engaging with business and community early, undertaking climate resilience planning and co-designing place-based solutions.  

“All of these show that local government can be both a stabilising force and a catalyst for transformation,” Jacqui notes.  

A few recent examples from the work The Next Economy has engaged with include:

 
South West Queensland launches economic blueprint for future 

South West Queensland is thinking differently about future opportunities and how the region participates in a future economy, launching a Future Economy Strategy. 

What if economic development starts with the wrong question? 

TNE program director Jacqui Bell joined economic development practitioners from across NSW to explore what a wellbeing economy looks like in practice, and what the Hay community’s approach to transition can teach the rest of us. 

Community insights for Uralla Shire’s energy future 

Working with Uralla Shire Council, The Next Economy engaged more than 150 residents to understand what matters most to them as large-scale renewable energy development takes shape in NSW’s New England region. The insights paper sets priorities for housing, services, jobs and nature to ensure fair outcomes as change accelerates. 

Our evidence to the NSW REZ inquiry: lessons from the ground 

Energy lead Saideh Kent appeared before the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry into the impact of renewable energy zones on rural and regional communities and industries in late March. It was an opportunity to highlight the great work communities in renewable energy zones are progressing and reinforce the critical role regions play in the development of renewable energy, says Saideh.  

The Next Economy has been working alongside Hay Shire Council in the South West REZ and Uralla Shire Council in the New England REZ for the past two years, and both councils endorsed reports of our work in the fortnight before Saideh appeared. Working closely with councils,Saideh says “you see how they are getting on with development, managing challenges and seeking the best outcomes for their communities”. 

Here Saideh shares some of her reflections…     

What we’re hearing on the ground 

The picture is more positive than the headlines often suggest. Communities are getting on with it, working alongside developers, EnergyCo and government departments to plan for what is coming and find solutions that work for them. We have seen genuine improvements in the NSW planning framework over the past two years, with greater clarity emerging around community engagement, landholder payments and benefit sharing, and EnergyCo’s funding support for local government has made a real difference to what councils can actually do – though they do remain very overstretched. 

Housing is a good example of communities turning a challenge into an opportunity. Both Hay and Uralla are progressing innovative housing solutions with developers and private investors, where short-term workforce demand creates the market conditions for investment in housing that will benefit the community long after construction is complete. 

Community engagement needs to be genuine 

Communities in REZ areas are not short of opportunities to be consulted, but the quality of that engagement matters enormously. People do not want to be asked by eight different project developers how they would like to spend community benefit funds. What they need more of is real involvement in decisions about transport routes, housing and workforce planning, all things that will affect their lives.  

Working in place provides the opportunity to bring all parties to the table to work through challenges and determine what is the best solution for local communities.  In some areas local employment targets are effective, in others, they can add stress to existing workforce shortfalls, so engaging communities in local solutions is so important. 

Local government belongs at the table 

Councils in REZ areas are doing an enormous amount of work.  Coordinating across agencies, planning for cumulative impacts, facilitating community engagement, often holding the process together in ways that are not always visible. The Next Economy supports Hay Shire Council’s call for councils to be recognised as strategic partners in the REZ planning framework, with concurrence required from councils in the development of conditions of consent. This would allow councils’ requirements and policies to be incorporated into the general terms of approval and give communities greater certainty. Continued and enhanced funding for council capability through the development and construction phases will also be essential. 

EnergyCo’s mandate and development outside the REZs 

EnergyCo’s coordination role has been valuable, but its broader authority rests on changeable footing under the current legislation. We would like to see that role clarified and reinforced so it has the ongoing mandate and funding to support communities across the full life of each REZ. I also raised the situation facing councils dealing with development outside the REZ access schemes, where cumulative impacts are just as real, but coordination support is much thinner and called for the REZ access merit criteria to be extended more broadly. 

Nature and local knowledge 

Reflecting on my evidence, an issue I did not get to raise at the inquiry but sees as critical: communities we have engaged with care deeply about the land and want to see nature-positive outcomes from these developments, which is entirely compatible with renewable energy. The University of New England is already undertaking research on biodiversity in solar farms, local farmers are keen to participate in biodiversity offset programs, and there is deep environmental expertise in the region that should be drawn on actively. We support the inquiry’s earlier recommendation calling on the NSW Government to identify ecological protection and restoration priorities for each REZ and encourage developers to contribute to positive regional environmental outcomes. 

What gives me confidence 

What stays with me after two years of this work is how capable these communities are., . Councils are coordinating across agencies, planning for large incoming construction workforces, facilitating community engagement across multiple projects, and doing most of it with constrained resources and a planning framework that has not always kept pace with what is happening on the ground.  

The opportunity on the other side of all this is significant. Better housing, lasting infrastructure, stronger local economies, nature-positive outcomes from development that is done well. But those things do not happen automatically. They take resourcing, coordination, and a framework that treats councils as partners who need support to get the best outcomes for their communities. 

That is ultimately what I wanted to leave the committee with, examples where the real challenges are being addressed by communities, that have done the hard work of showing up, engaging honestly and pushing for something better. 

Saideh at the inquiry with fellow speakers Chris O’Keefe and William Churchill from the Clean Energy Council.
 
Download the SaND Report
Download the Hay Report

Navigating the energy transition in 2026 

Saideh Kent leads The Next Economy’s energy work. In this Q&A she shares her thoughts on what shaped the transition in 2025, how communities are responding, and what lessons can be learned for the year ahead. 

What happened in 2025 that shaped the direction of the energy transition? 

This year brought some big shifts. The change of government in Queensland led to a different approach to energy policy, which has affected things like the pace of investment. In some cases, approvals were reversed or delayed. That created uncertainty for communities and project developers alike and reminded everyone how important consistent policy is for long term planning. 

One thing that stands out is how communities are becoming more involved in shaping outcomes. There is growing recognition of the importance of community benefit and social impact and we are seeing councils and local groups step in early. That is a positive sign, but many of them are still doing it without a clear process or enough support. 

There has also been some mixed messaging nationally around net zero, which made things harder for people trying to understand what is happening. The National Climate Risk Assessment helped bring clarity. It gave people something solid to refer to and set out clearly why action is needed. 

What is coming through in your conversations with regional communities? 

What we are seeing is that every place is different. The transition looks and feels different depending on where you are. Some regions are preparing for coal closures. Others are experiencing rapid growth in renewables. Many are dealing with both at once. And the resources available to manage change vary widely. 

But there is a clear sense of local leadership emerging. People are asking thoughtful questions about how this will affect their community and they are stepping into the conversation. There is strong appetite to engage, but also a need for more support to navigate the scale and speed of change. 

People want trustworthy information and space to plan properly. That is something we can support. When communities have the tools and time to get involved early, they can play a powerful role in shaping how things unfold. 

Meeting people where they’re at: speaking with Uralla locals about energy at their winter solstice.

How are regional leaders navigating the energy transition? 

What we are seeing across the board is commitment. Councils, community groups, Traditional Owners, local businesses and regional development agencies are working hard to bring people together and plan for what is coming. They are balancing short term, real-time pressures with planning for the long term and they are doing it with limited resources. 

They are also pushing for a greater say in decision making – continuing to call for place based approaches that engage people early and provide local people with an opportunity to inform actions that reflect local realities. People want to be partners in this transition, not just consulted after the fact. 

What we know through our work, is they when regional leaders are provided with the resources and support they need to lead and manage change well, the outcomes are better for everyone – this includes, but is not limited to, better coordination and stronger backing.  

Are there places where the transition is already going well? 

Yes, and those examples are really encouraging. In Mount Isa and Uralla Shire, for instance, councils have worked with communities and industry to plan early, developing roadmaps for the energy transition and broader economic change in their regions, that are grounded in the realities of each region.  

Those places are showing what is possible when you bring people together around a shared vision. They are looking at energy as part of a wider picture, including jobs, housing, infrastructure and services. 

Even in places facing significant pressure in real-time, such as Hay and the Hunter region in New South Wales or Gladstone in Queensland – there is creative thinking and action underway. Communities are not sitting back waiting for others to lead the way – they are building local partnerships, trialling new approaches and looking ahead on their own terms. 

At the Roma saleyards, connecting local history with the work of planning well for change in South West Queensland. Credit: Lyndsay Walsh. 

What is most needed now as we head into 2026? 

In Australia, the energy transition is well underway. It sometimes feels like we talk about is as though it is something that will happen in the future, not something that is happening right now.  We are well into implementation so need to shift from reacting to leading – building on the knowledge, resources and capabilities that have been developed across different regions over the last 10 years – to give regions the tools, information and support they need to plan, make informed decisions and take action.   

This also means being honest about the scale of the change required, the very real impacts and trade-offs and giving people space to shape it on their own terms. 

There is still a clear need for national frameworks that provide clarity and certainty as well as support good practice around engagement, benefit sharing and accountability. But they need to be flexible enough to work in different contexts. 

Most of all, we need to stay focused on what matters to people. This is not just about infrastructure or energy supply. It is about livelihoods, community wellbeing and the future of our regions. If we keep that at the centre and back the strengths that already exist in these places, we have every chance of making this transition work for everyone. 

Nature, people and place: why Australia’s environmental laws are critical for regions 

Australia is rewriting its national environmental laws in response to widespread recognition that the current system is failing both nature and communities. In our submission to the reform process, we shared what we’ve heard from regional Australians around how to make these laws work for people, place and the environment.

Australia’s national environmental laws (commonly referred to as the EPBC Act) are under reform, a long-awaited response to widespread recognition that the existing system has been failing both nature and communities. 

Regional Australians and communities are on the frontline of economic and environmental change. Major infrastructure and industry projects are reshaping landscapes, economies and communities at a pace not seen for decades. These developments will often fall under the scope of these reforms, and how the new national environmental laws are designed and implemented will directly affect regional people, places and industries. Getting it right for the regions is key to getting it right for the country. 

Lake Moondarra in Mt Isa, an important water resource for locals. Credit: Chris Grose

At The Next Economy, we made a submission to the recent national review process.  Drawing on years of work alongside regional communities, we highlighted how clear and effective national environmental laws are essential not only for protecting biodiversity, but for ensuring regional communities can participate in, inform, and benefit from sustainable development.  

We made a number of suggestions in our submission – including the need to involve regions as active partners in decisions around land, water, biodiversity and cultural heritage. Done well, this approach can build trust and provide long-term certainty for communities, industry and government. 

Regions care deeply about the environment, and want a say in looking after it 

People in regional areas have a deep connection to their local environments. First Nations peoples continue to care for Country they have for thousands of years. Farmers, land managers, and local organisations are restoring landscapes, protecting biodiversity, and trialling regenerative practices. 

The clear message from across our engagement is: people want to contribute to environmental stewardship, not be excluded from decisions that shape the places they live and work in. In turn, national environmental laws should reflect and support this shared responsibility. 

We’re not asking for handouts. We want the government to help us build sustainable, thriving and diverse regional communities.

Hunter Valley, NSW, resident

The pace of development is accelerating, and planning needs to keep up 

From energy infrastructure to new mines and transport projects, many regional communities of Australia are experiencing a scale of development not seen before in their lifetimes. While most recognise the importance of reducing emissions and diversifying local economies, there is also legitimate concern the speed of development could damage the ecosystems they depend on. 

For example, regional councils and planning bodies are under pressure, often managing overlapping project proposals without the resources or tools to coordinate them well. Proposed reforms to introduce bioregional planning could help manage cumulative impacts most effectively if the plans are developed transparently, with strong national environmental standards and meaningful community input.  

National Environmental Standards set the rules and benchmarks that guide how environmental decisions are made. Embedding the intent of the Standards into the reform bill itself avoids the risk of processes being inconsistent, politically vulnerable, and failing to meet their intended goals. 

What we have left in terms of biodiversity is precious and irreplaceable.

Uralla, NSW, resident 
Community hopes and concerns around how renewables might impact nature and land use, Uralla NSW. Credit: Lyndsay Walsh

Community engagement is essential to building trust 

Across every region we work in, from coal regions to those with agriculture and primary production as their foundation, people are asking for the same thing: early, clear and respectful engagement. They want to be involved in shaping the future, not just responding to decisions after they’re made. 

Good engagement can’t be rushed and should be covered in its own Standard. It needs to be local, inclusive, and transparent – especially when dealing with complex planning issues. Structured dialogue, space for different views and clear feedback loops are essential to making engagement meaningful. 

Staying informed, sharing what we are witnessing on the ground, and engaging in new ideas helps us better support Mount Isa families and individuals in need.

Mount Isa, Qld, resident

What’s needed to make these reforms work for regional Australia 

Our submission to the reform process highlighted several opportunities to improve outcomes through the EPBC Act: 

1. Participatory regional planning 

Our experience working with regions highlights that effective regional planning considers cumulative environmental, social, economic and cultural impacts. Processes should be place- based, participatory and inclusive of diverse local voices including Traditional Owners and communities, who have local knowledge of land, water and climate pressures. 

2. Safeguards around fast-track pathways 

While faster assessments may be beneficial, they should not come at the cost of strong environmental standards or community input. Trust in planning systems relies on transparent, consistent rules that apply to all projects – including large and high- risk developments. 

3. Local benefits from offsets and restoration 

Offset mechanisms provide an opportunity to support environmental repair in the regions they affect. That means investing in locally governed land care and restoration efforts that create jobs, strengthen drought resilience, and go some way in compensating for damage and impacts to local ecosystems. 

4. Embedding First Nations leadership 

It is critical that environmental laws respect cultural values and rights, including Free, Prior and Informed Consent. Recognising First Nations knowledge, governance and land management is essential to ecological restoration and climate resilience. 

5. Adapting to climate risk 

Assessment frameworks must account for a changing climate, not just today’s conditions. Climate risk and future impacts on ecosystems, water and communities should be central to all planning and approvals. 

We will know we are achieving a good energy transition when the environment is protected and nurtured.

Latrobe Valley, Vic, resident

Looking ahead: implementation will be the true test 

Sunset on the Hay Plains, NSW. Credit: Jacqui Bell

Legislation matters, but what matters more is how it’s applied on the ground. For our national environmental laws to be effective, implementation should happen in ways that: 

  • Deliver real improvements for the environment 
  • Support strong, inclusive regional economies 
  • Build public trust through transparency and accountability 
  • Reflect the values and knowledge of local communities. 

Regional Australia is where these reforms will play out – in our forests, farms, waterways, landscapes and towns. The knowledge and leadership already present in these communities is a critical part of getting it right. 

The Economy We Could Have: new paper out now

Australia’s economy looks strong on the surface, but behind the averages lie deep divides in housing, work, health and opportunity. Our new paper, The Economy We Could Have, asks what our economy is really designed to do, who it is working for, and how it can support people’s wellbeing.

Australia is at a pivotal moment. While headline statistics suggest strong performance, looking under the bonnet of these numbers reveals widening divides in housing, health, income, and opportunity. Rising inequality and climate disruption demand a closer look at our economic system: what is it designed to do – and who benefits?

The Economy We Could Have explores how Australia’s economic story has shifted over the decades, the divides created along the way, and the alternatives already being built. It sets out practical steps for governments, enterprises and communities to move beyond isolated “Lego wins” and instead embed a wellbeing economy – one that puts dignity, fairness, connection and ecological care at its centre.  

As lead author, Katherine Trebeck, puts it: 

Transformational change is possible. Australia has done it before – from Medicare to minimum wages – and we can do it again.  

The challenge

The paper traces Australia’s shift from predistribution – fair wages and public investment – to a model marked by precariousness, asset accumulation, and financial advantage for a few. It also highlights how system-compliant fixes and short-term crisis responses can stall deeper progress.

One in seven Australians live in poverty. Many face insecure work, unaffordable homes and stretched services that respond to crisis rather than prevent it. These outcomes are not inevitable. They are the result of decisions – shaped by values and power – that have concentrated advantage for some and shifted risks onto others. 

The alternatives

The good news that is change is possible. The economy is a human-made system, and it can be redesigned. Across the country, communities are already showing what that momentum for change is growing. Australians are increasingly dissatisfied with the status quo and open to rethinking economic priorities. 

One promising framework is the wellbeing economy, which according to the Wellbeing Economy Alliance can deliver the following needs: 

Nature, connection, dignity, fairness, participation

There are plenty of examples of these goals already being delivered in practice:

Earthworker Cooperative (Latrobe Valley, VIC)Australia’s first worker-owned factory, producing solar hot water systems to serve its worker-owners. 
Food Connect Shed (Brisbane, QLD): A cooperative food enterprise owned by 500+ ‘careholders’, rooted in equity and regeneration. 
Marlinja Power Project (NT): Community-installed solar panels and battery storage enabling near energy self-sufficiency – an example of climate resilience. 

Governments are beginning to respond. The Federal Government’s Measuring What Matters statement is expanding how national success is defined, incorporating indicators for health, sustainability, and social cohesion. In Victoria, the Early Intervention Investment Framework is embedding preventative health and social approaches into budget decisions, valuing long-term wellbeing over short-term fixes.

Australia’s future depends on whether we can move beyond piecemeal reforms to embrace systemic change. By learning from community-led initiatives and adopting frameworks like the wellbeing economy, we can build a more inclusive, resilient, and caring society – one that works for everyone. 

Read the full report here:

DOWNLOAD REPORT

Powering the transition while championing diversity

March 5 2025: Reimagining Diversity in Clean Energy Careers launches today. 

The rapid expansion of clean energy development is driving demand for hundreds of thousands of workers with diverse skills but right now many of those roles remain unfilled. 

This shortfall presents an opportunity. The Next Economy’s Reimagining Diversity in Clean Energy Careers report shows that by removing barriers to workforce participation for people from marginalised groups and communities, Australia can achieve a faster and fairer energy transition.  

It finds that fostering greater diversity and inclusion in the clean energy workforce can improve outcomes for individuals and communities, all while generating benefits for businesses and regional economies and helping Australia meet its renewable energy targets.  

Fostering greater diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in the workforce can improve outcomes for individuals and communities, as well as generate benefits for businesses and the economy.

The task is significant, but there are practical actions that can be taken to remove barriers to participation and build a workforce that delivers a faster, fairer and more inclusive transition to net zero.  

The report outlines several opportunity areas to help drive this change:    

  1. Foster a thriving workforce development ecosystem: connecting diverse stakeholders, creating the conditions for collaboration while supporting marginalised individuals and regional economies 
  1. Strengthen inclusive career development pathways: providing equitable access and opportunities for all learners and workers 
  1. Create supportive and inclusive workplaces: ensuring employees from diverse backgrounds feel welcome, valued and supported at work 

The report shows these opportunity areas work best when underpinned by a core principle of putting people at the centre of all workforce development efforts.  

Stakeholders from different sectors across Gladstone have set directions for their future and are working together to manage the net zero transition. Pictured here is a representative of the Queensland Department of State Development and Infrastructure, explaining the history of Gladstone’s industrial transitions to visiting philanthropists and investors. Source: The Next Economy / William Debois.

Developed through research, interviews and workshops and drawing on insights from The Next Economy’s work with regional communities at the frontline of the energy transition, the Reimagining Diversity in Clean Energy Careers report is a resource to support stakeholders take a broader view of what diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace can look like. It highlights actions that leads to workforce development in the clean energy sector that benefit everyone.  

To find out more, read the report here and share it among your networks.

Download Report


Curious to learn more about the report? We’ll be hosting a briefing session in April 2025. Register your interest to be notified of upcoming dates by filling out this form:

Mixed signals and missed champions: regional transition trends

(October 2024) Across Australia, communities are leading the transition to net zero – navigating multiple, compounding disruptions along the way – after years of minimal action or even discussion on climate change at a national level.

TNE’s Jacqui Bell, Dr Katherine Trebeck and Dr Amanda Cahill share key insights, ranging on topics from regional transition trends to nature and land use trade-offs to wellbeing economy principles, at the 2024 Better Futures Forum in September 2024. Photo credits: BFF/Gab Connolle

Here are five key trends or themes Dr Amanda Cahill, CEO of The Next Economy, and the team has observed in recent months: 

  1. Missing champions: The lived experiences of communities actively navigating the transition—experimenting, innovating, and addressing local needs—are often missing from the national conversation. From a community group in Gympie installing solar panels on local infrastructure to support vulnerable populations, including domestic violence shelters, to energy companies focused on creating long-term community benefits like housing, there are so many people getting on with it. We should be celebrating and learning from them. 
  2. Mixed signals: Regional communities are largely committed to the transition, but mixed signals from state and federal governments are not only frustrating they’re also undermining confidence to move forward with the real work. While there’s more investment in renewables and policies for net zero today than even a few years ago, new fossil fuel projects are still being approved even when expert bodies like the International Energy Agency say fossil fuel use must peak by 2025.  
  3. Models questioned: One of the most striking trends is the growing shift in how people think about the economy. For example, beyond day-to-day concerns like the cost of living, more communities are questioning the broader purpose of the economic system itself. The key question being asked is: if the economy isn’t directly benefiting local communities, what is its real value? Another question that keeps coming up is why development proponents decide whether their project will have social and environmental impacts on a community instead of a single, independent process and regulator. This shift in perspective signals a deeper rethinking of what good economic development really looks like. Read more: Rethinking economic responses: tackling the root causes of today’s challenges
  4. Many forms: The net zero transition is taking different shapes for different communities. For example, Mount Isa in Queensland is exploring how they can help the world to decarbonise and what it will take to develop their critical minerals processing potential while navigating the complexities that come with it. Meanwhile, in Hay and Carrathool in NSW’s Riverina region, communities are exploring how they are moving towards a future in agriculture and land use that’s both resilient to the impacts of climate change while responding to the decarbonisation of global supply chains. 
  5. Moving forward: We are now in the implementation phase of the net zero transition. It’s going to be challenging for a while, but we need to stay on course and remember that the decisions we make now really do matter. Right now, the infrastructure we invest in, the industries we promote and support, and how we build the capacity and mechanisms to ensure enduring community benefits, are all going to determine whether we reach our 2050 net zero goals – let alone the more ambitious ones that the science tells us we should be striving for. We can find a way forward that works for people and the planet.

The good news is, we have the knowledge, technology, skills and resources to draw from, we just need to get on with it. 

TNE staff at Heading Upstream Lab in August 2024, where leaders driving change across Australia convened to explore ways to put people and the planet first when it comes to the economy.

Mining towns want plan for energy transformation

Communities in Australia’s coal and gas heartlands say they need greater federal support and policy to mange the energy transition and make the most of economic opportunities.

Guest: Dr Amanda Cahill, CEO The Next Economy and author of What regions need on the path to net zero.

Duration: 12min 42sec
Broadcast: Sat 21 May 2022, 8:20am (the morning of the federal election)

Saturday Extra interview with Dr Amanda Cahill on the morning of the federal election

Energising the Future Economy of the Gladstone Region

Have your say in online survey about ‘Energising the Future Economy of the Gladstone Region’.

Locals across the Gladstone Region are invited to participate in an online survey to share their thoughts on the future changes to the energy sector and how the region can take advantage of emerging changes to generate new economic opportunities.

The survey content has been generated following a series of in-depth community and industry forums involving people from across the region.

Acting Gladstone Region Mayor Kahn Goodluck says Council would like to know if other residents share these views.

“Council recognises that the unfolding changes in the energy sector pose both challenges and opportunities for the Gladstone Region and people working in industry,” Councillor Goodluck said.

“This online survey is part of our joint initiative with The Next Economy – Energising the Gladstone Region Future Economy.

“Feedback from community, government, industry and other stakeholder groups will guide us on what is required to adapt to a changing energy sector and to support our region over the next 10 years.”

Full media release below:

Media ReleaseDownload

Transforming Queensland: The Case for a Transition Authority

The Queensland economy is being transformed as the world embraces the challenge to phase out fossil fuels and rapidly expand renewable energy generation in pursuit of net zero emissions goals. As one of the world’s biggest exporters of coal and gas, and with an ongoing reliance on coal fired electricity generation, these changes pose huge risks to the Queensland economy. They also present us with massive economic opportunities, given the state’s abundance of solar, wind and mineral resources.

The experiences of other regions and countries demonstrates that change can be managed well, but it requires a high degree of leadership, resourcing and coordination from government. Transition authorities have proven a successful vehicle to support governments in this task by bringing together stakeholders from across government, industry and the community to plan and coordinate efforts to proactively manage the phase out of fossil fuels and expansion of renewable energy.

Download

Stanwell Energy Corporation strategic advice

We worked with Stanwell in the development of their corporate strategy, which has led to the company not only integrating transition planning into their five-year strategy but has also led to the development of a workforce and community engagement plan to enable the company to start talking about the inevitability of transition out of coal.

Energy transition community forum

In the wake of the 2019 Federal Election, TNE was able to share the findings of previous transition strategy workshops undertaken in the Hunter Valley and Queensland to challenge the divisive rhetoric that all of regional Australia (especially Queensland) was actively opposed to and in denial of the energy transition. The results from the workshops were used in a widely-shared Guardian article written by CEO Amanda Cahill, that showed that many people were starting to accept that the transition is inevitable, and that there were a number of economic challenges across regional Australia that was exacerbating fear, uncertainty and division. 

This article caught the attention of the Deputy Premier of Queensland, who was concerned about the growing division across the State. At the invitation of the Deputy Premier, Amanda participated in a community forum, where she challenged the government’s view that they should avoid talking about transition. Subsequent meetings led to Amanda convincing the State Government to fund the Energy Transitions Roadshow.